
This after shot shows the final pickup in the cleared swamp.
National Park Service Contracts and Fish and Wildlife Service Contracts do not mandate MSPA compliance, even though both agencies manage large sections of forest and require the same kinds of services as the U.S. Forest Service. So while we have always maintained MSPA compliance, we have been on contracts that were not governed by MSPA, and we have at times over the years let certain parts of the license lapse. This is generally due to simple human oversight, like forgetting to renew a driver’s license before it expires.
Our company assumed in the start of the MSPA program in forestry that in order to bring workers in from a foreign country who have no real money that the employer would be required to house and transport the workers. To that end we rented and then purchased the house below to set up a place for our employees to live.

The structure is actually a combination of a double wide trailer (area with red porch attached) with two other buildings attached to it. Starting with the baywindows and the rest of the two story structure the first order of work was to wire the section as it had zero functional wiring when we first least the house. Over the last year we have now rewired most of the original double wide section of the home including new wire and a new breaker box coming from the meter box. (It helps to have an retired industrial electrician in the family, Jill's dad)
 |
 |
| Typical rooms in the crewhouse. |
We have always had to work on a small budget, since our competition completely avoided this issue. Funds had to come from our bank and or contract earnings. The decision at the federal level to allow for the hiring of migrants and temporary guest workers without insuring that the company was providing housing and transportation services has continued to depress prices in this industry. The issuing of a MSPA license without “officially” providing housing and transportation services to forest conservation workers has made finding the money to make upgrades difficult. Thus when one looks at our list of completed contracts one will see that we have spent most of the last decade on more complex environmental restoration contacts that have allowed us to make improvements on the crew-house and setup housing such as what we did in Key West for our crews.
We have spent Tens of thousands of dollars maintaining housing and transportation standards for over a decade in spite of the fact that most of our industry’s competition simply avoids the issue by hiding behind their pay disclosures, saying that they do not control housing or transportation so if the crew is living 8 to 10 men in a 12x60 foot trailer, or riding in a van with bad tires or worn out shocks, it is not the contractor’s fault.
This veil has existed for the entire time we have been using migrant and H2B workers from Mexico and other counties.
Since WE HAVE OFFERED TO TRANSPORT AND HOUSE our employees from the start more that 15 years ago, we have been subject to compliance on these two certification issues that most of our competition has avoided. Since they have claimed that they have no influence in the issue, the DOL does not check the area for compliance.
In the last 15 years we have generally been inspected about every 3 years. And like a restaurant being inspected by the health department, making a 100 is hard to do. Generally speaking, I would rank our inspections with a grade of 85 to 95. But to quote DOL inspector Delgado, “I can always find something to bust a company on.” It’s true, one screen window missing or out of place is a violation, un-cut grass is a violation, etc.
So we have done a compliance dance with the U.S. DOL for some 15 plus years over standards that many in our industry simply avoid. It is true that many forestry contractors now seek certification to transport but we do not know of any who have made the efforts to purchase and maintain a house and supply a decent place for people to live. Since most of our work is away from our hometown, our crew house services as a base. If crew is between contracts we do not charge anything for housing and transport services, if it is an extended period of time. Crew is also welcomed to fish at our family pond located on our tract of land adjoining the crewhouse.

So, in our last audit we were cited for housing violations. The summer before our fall season started, we were given a nice ranch home in Buckhead (north Atlanta) to take down for materials by one of our tree farmer clients.
When Inspector Brock showed up he saw the house in repair mode and cited us for a number of violations. None of which posed a real danger to the crew as the wiring he thought was “exposed wiring” had no power in the circuits. Nevertheless we refunded the housing that we had charged the crew, (even though in actuality they were in a motel in Pierson GA for most weeks for which we were cited) finished up the repairs, and we had Mr. Delgado come back and re-inspect the house. He agreed once again that the house was in good order and overall is a sound crew house. Since his visit we have continued to make improvements on the house from the materials we obtained. |